Woman awarded thousands after routine tooth extraction leaves her in intensive care
Saira Malik said she was still traumatised by the treatment many years later

Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A London mother-of-three has received an ?8,500 settlement after a routine tooth extraction resulted in a fractured jaw, haemorrhage and a stay in intensive care.
Saira Malik, 54, a civil servant from Surbiton, endured a traumatic ordeal following a procedure at a local dental practice in September 2019.
Malik, a long-standing patient, was initially referred to a different practice for the extraction of an upper right molar in March 2019 due to persistent toothache. However, the pain continued in her upper mouth. Upon returning to her regular dentist in August 2019, she was advised to have her upper left molar removed.
Malik said there was difficulty during the extraction leading to āpulling and shovingā, which caused her to suffer a haemorrhage and pass out.
She woke up in hospital in the intensive care unit, later finding out her upper jaw had fractured during the extraction and a large chunk of bone was pulled out with the tooth, meaning she could only consume liquids through a straw for months afterwards.

āAll you could see was just blood and blood and bloodā¦ it was continuous buckets of blood, gushing through.
āWhen I woke up in hospital, I was in the intensive care unit. I was on machines to stop the bleeding and I was told my jaw was fractured.
āIām still traumatised, I still havenāt been able to walk into a dentist since then.ā
Specialist dental negligence solicitors, the Dental Law Partnership, took on Malikās case in 2019, and it was successfully settled in May 2024 when she was paid ?8,500 in an out-of-court settlement ā although the dental practice owners who paid it did not admit liability.
In a statement, the practice said it does ānot agree with the facts as conveyed by the Dental Law Partnershipā but it takes āpride in providing the highest standards of treatment and care to all (its) patientsā.
Malik said she was able to use some of this money to pay for a family trip to Egypt in November 2024 to celebrate her grandsonās first birthday and make āhappyā memories.

Malik is now encouraging others to seek a second opinion if they are unsure of the advice and treatment they are receiving, and to trust their gut instinct.
āDonāt be afraid to question the professionals and take a second opinion if you need to be 100 per cent sure,ā she said.
āI feel that by receiving the settlement, it shows that something has been done and I wasnāt just forgotten about.ā
In a statement, the practice said: āWe would like to make it clear that we do not agree with the facts as conveyed by the Dental Law Partnership, but we cannot provide details of this patientās treatment and management because of our professional duty to protect the confidentiality of our patients.
āThis claim was resolved by way of an out-of-court settlement, with no admission of liability on our part. We take pride in providing the highest standards of treatment and care to all our patients.ā